Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Nitric Oxide production in Systemic sclerosis


Curator: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a type of autoimmune disease when the body’s immune system attacks and destroys body’s healthy tissue. It is characterised by lesions in the vessels and accumulation of collagen in the tissues. Although the pathogenesis of this disease is not clear, but one of the suggestions is that the endothelium fails to produce NO upon cold stimulation. Physiologically, NO acts as a vasodilator and its deficiency has been implicated in diseases such as hypertension and atherosclerosis.
In the body NO is generated when L-arginine is converted to L-citruline in the presence of NO synthase (NOS) enzyme, molecular oxygen, NADPH, and other cofactors. Principally, three isoenzymes of NOS are present in the body to catalyse the production of NO in various anatomic locations and under various physiological conditions. Three distinct genes encode for the three types of NOS i.e. endothelial (eNOS or NOS-3), neuronal (nNOS or NOS-1), and inducible (iNOS or NOS-2) NOS.
The inducible type 2 NOS (iNOS) may act as an immunoregulator. Several reports have provided evidence for the existence of a NO pathway in human mononuclear cells.
It is not well established if NO production increases or decreases in SSc patients. In one study by Allanore et al, NO production was shown to be reduced in plasma and PBMC supernatants, and iNOS synthesis in PBMCs.
The authors of this study investigated NO metabolites in plasma and PBMC supernatants, and iNOS synthesis in PBMC to see if the level of NO production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was low in SSc, as this might contribute to the vasodilatory abnormalities observed in this disease.
Eighteen patients with SSc were compared with two control groups: 16 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 23 patients with mechanical sciatica.The NO metabolites nitrite and nitrates were determined by flurometeric and spectrometeric assays respectively. iNOS expression was determined by using monoclonal anti‐NOS2 antibody and FACS analyses.
The data suggested a decrease in plasma NO concentration and iNOS production in PBMC in patients with systemic sclerosis as compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis and sciatica. Subgroup analysis showed no difference between limited and diffuse SSc forms. Total plasma nitrite concentrations in five healthy volunteers were similar to those in patients with sciatica, which is consistent with this group being an appropriate control group.
Thus the authors suggest that low NO production in Ssc patients might be involved in the tendency towards vasospam.
However in other studies authors have shown an increase in NO production in SSc patients. Takagi et al set out to investigate this discrepancy in NO production in SSc patients. They sought to determine whether increased NO levels are associated with various clinical subsets of SSc patients, and to assess the contribution of fibroblasts in skin lesions to NO synthesis.
In this study Takagi et al measured the levels of serum NO metabolites in SSc patients and determined the contribution of the excessive production of NO synthase (NOS)-2 by skin fibroblasts to NO synthesis. Serum NO levels of 45 patients with SSc were significantly higher than those of 20 healthy volunteers. In addition, some clinical features of SSc (the extent of skin fibrosis, short disease duration, and the complication of active fibrosing alveolitis) were all correlated positively with the levels of NO metabolites in SSc patients. RT PCR was used to determine NOS-2 mRNA expression levels in cultured fibroblasts derived from SSc patients.
The authors showed that serum NO levels were significantly elevated in patients with SSc as compared to healthy normal controls. They also demonstrated that NOS-2 was produced spontaneously by cultured SSc fibroblasts, suggesting that increased serum NO levels might reflect in part the elevated expression of NOS-2 by fibroblasts derived from SSc patients.
The discrepancy in NO production could be explained by disease stage, severity of tissue fibrosis and various circumstances of endothelial damage. Takagi et al found increased NO production in early stages of SSc with tissue fibrosis and not in later stages of the disease. Hence they suggest that NO levels may be a sensitive marker of the early stages of the development of severe tissue fibrosis in SSc patients, although a longitudinal and prospective study is needed to confirm this.
NO is known to have dual functions in the body, both beneficial and cyototoxic. Generally it depends upon the concentration and the duration of NO production. Similarily in SSC, the dual functions of NO seem to be both beneficial (as a vasodilator) and harmful (as a cytotoxic effector) in regard to the clinical manifestations of SSc. One of the limitations of these studies is that they did not investigate the absolute concentrations of NO production but only its metaoblites were measured. This might be due the fact that NO is a short-lived molecule (half-life < 5 s) and it is challenging to quantify NO production at single cell level. Such techniques (e.g.DAR 4M AM flurophore) have been developed but are challenging to apply to various experimental set ups. DAR 4M AM has been used to quantify NO production online in single cells. In SSc determination of absolute NO concentrations at cellular or tissue level at various stages of the disease process will go a long way in solving the discrepancy of NO production in SSc patients.
Sources

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Nitric Oxide in bone metabolism


Author: Aviral Vatsa
Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived, highly reactive, free radical which is ubiquitously present in the human body. Physiologically, it is widely used as a second messenger both an inter-cellular and intra-cellular signaling molecule. NO is produced when L-arginine is converted to L-citruline in the presence of NO synthase (NOS) enzyme, molecular oxygen, NADPH, and other cofactors. Principally, three isoenzymes of NOS are present in the body to catalyse the production of NO in various anatomic locations and under various physiological conditions. Three distinct genes encode for the three types of NOS i.e. endothelial (eNOS or NOS-3), neuronal (nNOS or NOS-1), and inducible (iNOS or NOS-2) NOS. Neuronal NOS and endothelial NOS are calcium-dependent enzymes, whereas inducible NOS is a calcium-independent inducible enzyme, that is activated and upregulated by cytokines during inflammatory processes. The tissue-specificity indicated in the names is not absolute as these subtypes have been discovered in wider locations in the body.
In bone, NO plays a vital role in mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Osteocytes are widely accepted as the ‘professional’ mechanosensors in bone. They sense external mechanical loads on bone and produce chemical signals such as NO and prostaglandins. NO in turn has been shown to modulate the activity of both bone forming osteoblasts and bone resorbing osteoclasts. NO is essential for load-induced bone formation in vivo. Studies using single gene deletions have shown that NO is an important cog in the wheel for bone metabolism and bone remodelling. Although eNOS isotype is widely implicated in NO production in bone, but recent studies indicate that iNOS isotype might also be involved in NO production in bone in response to mechanical loading. Targeted deletion of eNOS shows mild osteoporotic phenotype in mice and iNOS pathway has been implicated in L-1-induced osteoclastic bone resorption. Hence both NOS isoforms have important role in bone remodelling.
Challenges to study NO: NO is a small, short-lived signalling molecule. It has a half life of less than 5 sec, which makes its online detection very difficult. Predominantly, the more stable metabolites of NO such as nitrites and nitrates are detected by using techniques such as Greiss reagent. They are however lited by the sensitivity levels and their inability to detect actual levels of NO. However, fluorescent dyes such as DAR 4M and DAF dyes are potent tools to detect online NO production at single cell level. These dyes are membrane-permeable, hence are taken up readily by the cells. Once inside the cell they are metabolised and rendered membrane-impermeable. When cell produces NO these dyes trap NO and get converted into fluorescent product, which can then be detected by using fluorescence microscopy. Moreover, by using these techniques, quantitative analyses of NO production (not only its metabolites) is feasible in live, single cells.
Molecular methods to investigate mRNA or protein levels of NOS enzymes are also used to corroborate with the changes in NO production levels.
Sources:

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Osteoblast cell lines: a review


In search of an osteoblast cell model for in vitro research.

reported by aviralvatsa
E M Czekanska; M J Stoddart; R G Richards; J S Hayes
Eur Cell Mater 24, 1 (2012)
Regenerative Medicine Institute, National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.jessica.hayes@nuigalway.ie.

The process of bone formation, remodelling and healing involves a coordinated action of various cell types. Advances in understanding the biology of osteoblast cells during these processes have been enabled through the use of various in vitro culture models from different origins. In an era of intensive bone tissue engineering research, these cell models are more and more often applied due to limited availability of primary human osteoblast cells. While they are a helpful tool in developing novel therapies or biomaterials; concerns arise regarding their phenotypic state and differences in relation to primary human osteoblast cells. In this review we discuss the osteoblastic development of some of the available cell models; such as primary human, rat, mouse, bovine, ovine and rabbit osteoblast cells; as well as MC3T3-E1, MG-63 and SaOs-2 cell lines, together with their advantages and disadvantages. Through this, we provide suggestions on the selection of the appropriate and most relevant osteoblast model for in vitro studies, with specific emphasis on cell-material based studies.

Key Words: Osteoblast; differentiation; primary cells; cell lines; in vitro cell models.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...